Law Offices of Ralph A. Dyer, P.A.
Business and Commercial Litigation
Recent Cases
  • VILLAR v. KERNAN, FED-96-600, SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, 1997 ME 132; 695 A.2d 1221; 1997 Me. LEXIS 133

  • LICHTENSTEIN v. CONSOLIDATED SERVS. GROUP, Civil No. 95-34-P-C, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6045

  • LUNDBORG v. PHOENIX LEASING, No. 95-2278, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 91 F.3d 265; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19195

  • COMBINED MGMT. v. SUPERINTENDENT OF THE BUR. OF INS. OF MAINE, No. 93-1874, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 22 F.3d 1; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8387; 18 E.B.C. 1208, Certiorari Denied 1994 U.S. LEXIS 7320

  • THOMPSONS POINT, INC. v. SAFE HARBOR DEV. CORP., CIVIL NO. 93-217-P-H, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE, 862 F. Supp. 594; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13088

  • MOORE v. MAINE INDUS. SERVS., Decision No. 6976, Law Docket No. CUM-93-567, SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, 645 A.2d 626; 1994 Me. LEXIS 159

  • CITY OF AUBURN v. TRI-STATE RUBBISH, INC., Decision No.6625, Law Docket No. AND-92-352, SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, 630 A.2d 227; 1993 Me. LEXIS 160; 1993-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P70,333; 24 ELR 21148
The material on this site may be considered paid publicity under Maine Bar Rules promulgated by the Supreme Judicial Court.This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.